A Rolling Stone

The Gospel accounts tell that a large stone was used to block the entrance to Jesus’ tomb (Matt 27:60). Many modern artists incorrectly depict that stone as a massive 5-6′ stone disk. Archaeology tells a different story, and one that fits better with the Gospel accounts.

Archaeologists have excavated hundreds of rock-hewn burial caves around Jerusalem from the time of Jesus. Three different types of tomb closures have been found: swinging stone doors, large circular disks, and heavy square blocking stones. The first two types, swinging stone doors and large circular disks, are quite rare and are found only on the most expensive tombs. The heavy square blocking stones make up about 98 percent of tomb closures from this time. So how do we know which was used for Jesus’ tomb?

Some of the Gospel accounts refer to the blocking stone being “rolled” (variations of the Greek word kulio, κυλίω, e.g. Mark 15:46, Luke 24:2). This would fit well with a disk-shaped stone, but doesn’t require a disk-shaped stone. For example, the same Greek word is also used to describe a boy “rolling about” on the ground (Mark 9:20). A blocky object could also be rolled, particularly if it were quite heavy. In his gospel, John described the stone as having been simply “taken away” (Gk. airo, αἴρω). So the language used would allow for a disk-shaped blocking stone, but does not appear to require it.

Perhaps most important, then, is what the angel did after removing the stone. According to Matt 28:2, he sat on it. Here is where we find a definitive answer. Every tomb that has been discovered in Israel that was sealed with a disk-shaped stone had a covered slot into which the stone was rolled, something like a pocket-door. This was necessary to prevent the stone from tipping or being tipped over, either inadvertently or at the hands of tomb robbers. This also means that no one could possibly roll the stone back into its concealed pocket and then sit on it. [It is noteworthy that this feature, which appears in every tomb with a disk-shaped door closure that has been found, is conveniently ignored in virtually every modern depiction of the tomb of Jesus.]

Rolling stone tomb at Khirbet Midras; note how the stone is rolled back into an enclosure.

The tomb with a disk-shaped closure shown above is at Khirbet Midras, located southwest of Bethlehm. The tomb shown below is in Abu Gosh, just west of Jerusalem. Both illustrate how the disk-shaped stones rolled back into a covered pocket.

Rolling stone tomb in Abu Gosh

A square blocking stone, on the other hand would make a very natural seat, as they are generally the size that would make an ideal place to sit. The blocking stone shown below (also known as a golel) is from a tomb in Jerusalem known as Jason’s Tomb. Notice that it has been tipped (rolled) back from the tomb entrance, and would make a great seat.

Blocking stone from “Jason’s Tomb” in Jerusalem

It is also of interest that the women who first came to the tomb were worried about their ability to move the stone. “And they were saying to one another, ‘Who will roll away the stone for us from the entrance of the tomb?'” (Mark 16:3). A large disk-shaped stone should have been relatively easy to roll back, but the standard square blocking stone would be quite difficult to remove. This kind of stone, then, is almost certainly the kind of stone that the angel rolled back from the entrance to Jesus’ tomb, and sat upon. And on a rare occasion an artist will even get it right, as did the Russian painter Mikhail Nesterov in his The Empty Tomb, 1889.

“The Empty Tomb,” by Mikhail Nesterov, 1889


    1. Interesting analysis on the rolling stone,etc. l believe the missing rolling stone from the Garden Tomb has been found.It is enormous. The diameter is about 9 ft. And it’s a bout 15 inches thick. It is on public display but its origins is not known.

      In our English version speaking of the rolling stone:”…the stone was rolled away -for it was very large.”

      Mark the “specific”inspired writer in the Greek Mark 16:4 says the “stone” that was a cover for the tomb entrance “…it was indeed! megas [or gigantic]extremely.”
      When l first read this in Greek l was surprised as Mark was saying -as does Matthew in his description of the rolling stone- the stone was not just massive (Gk) it was extremely distinctively massive!He prefixed this with gar Gk. “indeed !”

      There is not getting around (no pun) it that stone was super huge,indeed he says.
      The rolling Stone at Nebo is 15 inches wide. The Garden tomb stone track is 15 inches wide. This trough it still there with a blocking stone where the original rolling stone would stop. A sample of the large stone of Nebo and a sample of the rock face of the Garden were examined by a certified lab. Both samples by test had the exact composition they were a match.
      The chiseling marks were examined by professionals.The Stone of Nebo and the hewn stone cut from rock ( Garden tomb – new brand new unused tomb had been cut or hewn from Petra rock a cliff made of stone Matt.27:60 Matthew calls this stone massive megas)had the same chiseled marks as the Stone from Nebo.
      How did it get 30 miles away near Moses’ Mt.Nebo is a mystery.I read where large heavy stone works would be carried by a large team of oxen.There were periodic invasions by Islamic armies into the Holy Land so to preserve the Jesus tomb stone it was taken away. It was found on the earth near Mt.Nebo years later so they used it as a guarding or protective stone for a monastery.

      Incidentally, the stone face of the Garden tomb bears scarring of the original large rolling stone made and it matches the height of the Mt Nebo Stone! Photos were taken too.
      I am going to post a picture of the Stone.

      • A major problem with this identification is that the so-called “Garden Tomb” is actually an Iron Age tomb (1000-586 BC), not from the time of Jesus. And the gospels specifically identify the tomb Jesus was laid in as a new tomb (Matt 27:60; John 19:41). Archaeologists have known this for some time (see the discussion in John McRay’s Archaeology and the New Testament). In fact, even the owners and operators of the Garden Tomb will admit this if pressed, but its not something they advertise. The garden tomb is a beautiful and peaceful place to contemplate the passion of Jesus, but it wasn’t the tomb of Jesus.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *